User:Knm027/Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps/Freshwater598 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Knm027


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Knm027/Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * New Article

Lead
The lead has been updated, it provides basic background information that is related to the topic title.

Yes, a very good opening sentence

There is no article sections yet, because this is a new article

N/A

The lead is concise, because this is can be a broad topic they did a good job in narrowing down the site and what it involves.

Content
Yes, the content is relevant to the topic at hand

The content added is up to date, the source is from the EPA which regularly updates and improves their information

No, the content belongs. Obviously because this article is new, there are going to be parts missing while the writer is creating it

No and yes. There is always concern with populations that surround superfund sites.

Tone and Balance
Yes the content added is neutral

No there are no bias claims

No there are no overly represented viewpoints

No, the information given is equal on all platforms

Sources and References
Yes, the EPA is reliable

Yes, the article correctly depicts the information from the source

Yes the sources that are thorough

The source is current because the EPA does updates if they have new information

The source link for this article works and is reliable

Organization
Yes it is clear and easy to read

No grammatical errors

The content here is through and depicts the source well

For New Articles Only
There is not 2-3 sources yet, however the one that is present is reliable and upholds Wikipedia's Notability requirement, in my opinion.

Yes the section headings follow the lines of many of the other Wikipedia articles

No, however there could be an add in to the sentence where the Superfund site is mentioned, can link into the Superfund wiki site or the other about the list of Superfund sites.

Overall Impression
This article, as a start is good. I believe that as this article is continued It will prove to be very informational. The only real suggestion that I have is to add the link about the Superfund into the article. :)