User:Knm027/Cape Fear River/RLW016 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?  Knm027, Freshwater598, Acoleithon, L.holmie
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Knm027/Cape Fear River

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? No
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? N/A
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? N/A
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? N/A
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Very small and undetailed. This is something y'all could edit to introduce the other paragraphs.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No the pollution content will add information to the page
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No all content for the GenX has ciatations.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * For pollution intro and suspended solids there are no citations
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? T
 * The citations that are present are from reliable sources esp for GenX. Other paragraphs need citations.
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Yes some are government pages and some are research articles
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * You can add a link to Fayetteville, NC in GenX Chemicals

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes I feel like it is clear and easily understandable
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * *point-source and non-point source pollution in pollution paragraph intro
 * Suspended solid paragraph: I would generally just ay hurricanes but if you want to leave hurricane Florence as an example it needs to be captilized
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Really like the report here link

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? NO
 * Are images well-captioned? N/A
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? N/A

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? yes except for the first 2 paragraphs
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? Yes
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? it follows the same flow
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Yes

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes it adds more information to make the page more rich
 * What are the strengths of the content added?Medium it is an introduction to these issues
 * How can the content added be improved? It can be elaborated with different types of pollution or it can be more elaborate.