User:Koakhtzvigad/test

Arbitration enforcement action appeal by Koakhtzvigad
''Procedural notes: The rules governing arbitration enforcement appeals are found in this 2010 ArbCom motion. According to that motion, a "clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors" is required to overturn an arbitration enforcement action. To help determine any such consensus, involved editors may make brief statements in separate sections but should not edit the section for discussion among uninvolved editors. Editors are normally considered involved if they are in a current dispute with the sanctioning or sanctioned editor, or have taken part in disputes (if any) related to the contested enforcement action. Administrators having taken administrative actions are not normally considered involved for this reason alone (see WP:UNINVOLVED).''


 * Appealing user : – ~


 * Sanction being appealed : banned from making edits related to the Israeli-Arab conflict for two weeks, imposed at Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement


 * Administrator imposing the sanction :


 * Notification of that administrator : The appealing editor is asked to notify the administrator who made the enforcement action of this appeal, and then to replace this text with a diff of that notification. The appeal may not be processed otherwise. If a block is appealed, the editor moving the appeal to this board should make the notification.

Statement by Koakhtzvigad
My reason to appeal is to enable me to return to editing articles instead of AE pages. As will be seen from below, it is also to expose blatant transgression of Wikipedia policies, and protection of these transgressions that feed the Arab-Israeli editing conflicts.

Result of the appeal by Koakhtzvigad

 * This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.