User:Kobe Clark/Like Mike/GFrye Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Kobe Clark
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j9g_5ucqp5viD07opO7GZQR5H26Al_K12zb2sbTCK-k/edit

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation

 * The lead has not been updated.
 * Yes, the lead includes a concise introductory sentence.
 * Yes, the lead includes brief descriptions of the article's major sections.
 * The lead does not include information not present in the article.
 * The lead is concise given the article's overall length.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation

 * Content added is relevant.
 * Yes, content is up to date.
 * To my knowledge, no content is missing.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation

 * Yes, the content added is neutral.
 * No claims appear to be heavily biased.
 * Viewpoints are equally represented.
 * Content doesn't attempt to persuade the reader.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation

 * New statement are linked to sources.
 * Yes, sources seem thorough.
 * Yes, sources seem current considering that the movie was released in 2002.
 * The links I checked all worked.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation

 * The new content needs to be re-written so that it is less of a review and is not in first person.
 * Some sentences of added content are run-ons and could be broken up.
 * Again, new content should be re-written and reorganized so that it is incorporated seamlessly into the section rather being at the end of every section.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation

 * Yes, content added has improved the quality of the article.
 * Content added includes relevant information, but needs to be reworded.
 * The added content could be improved by rewording sentences so that they are not in first person/are less of a review of the article. In addition, information provided in the new content should be reorganized so that it flows well with the existing content in the article.