User:Kobikj/Aplysia argus/Kyle.Eppert Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kobikj


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Kobikj/Aplysia argus - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Your article looks very organized and well written! I am certainly taking notes from your article and planning to apply them to mine to help improve my own. The main feedback that comes to mind to further develop your article is to possibly look for an additional source or two to give you some more information in order to expand your current sections. Your current sources looked well rounded and reliable! The flow of the article felt good as well, neutral points of view, looking at describing the basic facts of your organism. Overall you have done an excellent job! As stated previously my only thought for improvement is additional sources to aid in expanding each section.

''Thank you Kyle for peer reviewing my wiki page. I found some great sources when we first started looking for our sources. I think by adding more sources and information to my wiki page will only help develop and expand my page more so I will definitely do that for my final product. Also looking at the example wiki pages that our professor provided really helped me get an idea on how to organize my page. So if you need to refer to a final product wiki page, you should check those out!''