User:Kocurran1123/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (Clitoral Pump)
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I choose this article in order to learn more about different sex toys that those with clitoris may use.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes it does.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes it does.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes it does, the rest of the article does not include a section on the use.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is concise.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes it is.
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes it is.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? There could be a section on uses and different platforms that the pump has been used in.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Not really but there is a place for that to happen. There could be more inclusion in how this toy is used in BDSM.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Not really but they could add in references to what uses this toy has had historically.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Not really, there is only one source.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? No, they could add much more references and sources.
 * Are the sources current? No, they are over 10 years old.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? It does not seem so.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes they do but the links are not accurate sources.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes it is concise and easy to read.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes other than the lack of historical use.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes but they should include more mainstream images with different types.
 * Are images well-captioned? No.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? I believe so.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There are no conversations.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? Yes it is but it is rated very low.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? Not much difference.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? It pretty good.
 * What are the article's strengths? It is concise and has a good amount of resources for different types.
 * How can the article be improved? It needs to have better photos and better inclusion of the history and ways it has been used.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? It is pretty good but still a little underdeveloped.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback:Talk:Clitoral pump