User:Kolpinge1191/Glioblastoma/0703jiveyjane Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kolpinge1191


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Kolpinge1191/Glioblastoma


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Glioblastoma

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead is good, although it seems that that is the content that was on the current version of the article. We would suggest adding more into this section about the overall concept of what epidemiology is.

The content was well written and kept neutral, however, the "Survival and Outcomes" section seems to mirror information that is already found under the Prognosis section of the current version. In place of this, you could talk about time trends of the disease - how has the prevalence changed, how has outcomes improved with treatment changes?

Under the Geography section, you could see if there is a map, similar to ones shown in class, that display where Glioblastomas commonly occur. Also taking into consideration the change in classification of glioblastomas in different regions, as mentioned in the current version.

You could expand further with risk factors on how behavior and environment plays a role.

Overall, this was well done. The format was simple and easy to follow. Double check the overlap of information that you are adding with information that is already in the current version. Great job.