User:Konniehatz/Non-renewable resource/Atharvawadodkar Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Konniehatz)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Konniehatz/Non-renewable resource


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Non-renewable resource

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

The lead is concise and describes the article's major sections. It has not been updated. It includes an introductory sentense to describe the articles topic.

Content

The content adds is relevant topic but it does not describe if it is a new section added under Fossil fuel or a new section all-together.

Tone and Balance The tone of the content added is neutral. The content added has no overrepresented or underrepresented viewpoints and has no bias towards any positions.

Sources and References

The content is backed up with relevant sources but more literature citations could improve the credibility of the content. There are only a few sources.

Organization

The content is well-written and is easy to read. It is well organized and reflects major points of the topic.

Images and Media

The article includes an image and is visually appealing but it does not include a citation.

Overall Impression

The content added improves the article by talking more on the types of fossil fuels. It describes the formation of coal in proper terms.