User:Kosh chris

“Emotion on the wheels of injustice”
The question is who balances the scales of the world? Not the physical world but the emotional world we live in, one person is to board a train with the hope of heading to the same location as the person you choose to travel with. I don’t mean the physical train or the locomotives that existed during the old time neither do I refer to the steam trains. I literally talk about the emotional train that leads people to show up in your life at some point in time. I can’t really tell with exact accuracy as to who boards the others train or do the two happen to be at the same train station to board the same train heading the same destination. Would their interest in the destination be shared or they just happen to board the train regardless of the purpose provided the train takes them some place. In my opinion regarding the issue, I would choose to on one hand to differ on basis of the expectation time of the two parties. At one time this could be the place of changing trains for either of them or probably both to begin with may not be changing trains at all rather boarding the first train. On the other side I also wish to go into detail about the imbalance that I intend to address here. This one person is busy loving someone who is busy loving someone else and that someone else is busy loving someone else and the circle of emotional injustice or call it imbalance if you please, keeps going on and on. One person boards a train expecting some other person of their preference to board the train at other place and that other person is also on a train heading the opposite direction hoping for the person of their preference to come in at any station and little do they know that the other person is either boarding the opposite train at another station or waiting to unknowingly board a different train while the train they are supposed to board is leaving or is even busy boarding while the other is alighting from that particular train on which they are boarding. So this is the injustice or rather the imbalance that I seek to address here. They say destiny has its own way of self-correcting itself or rather fate has a way to fix itself because it’s what everyone seeks to believe is the cure for the injustice. but literally how is any of the two supposed to correct this justice unless it makes the trains collide which of course cannot and may not happen given the trains are heading opposite directions and also just like the way there cannot be two suns in the same sky, the trains could happen to be In the same station at the same time but cannot happen to be on the same platform at the same time. Unless someone could seek to argue that the fate or destiny is the train master who may and not fully guarantee control over the rail lines since he doesn’t make the train time table to begin with. So at one point in time the injustice gets corrected somehow but at a price. The price could be boarding the same train while time is not in favour of the two of you which could be literally after lost time and more also since someone has to pay the price, it means some party somewhere ends up getting what he hasn’t subscribed for because some other party is busy anguishing the loss they face because it balances or rather cancels by him profiting out of it as they say one man’s gain is another man’s loss. This will mean that the injustice is meant to remain at any point in time so that someone else could benefit out of the injustice thereby leading us to the wonder of who the judge and the executioner on this matter ought to be. A neutral party to the injustice or the party that seeks to benefit from the injustice or should it be the party that suffers the loss so as to comfort the party about the loss.