User:Kporras5/Gloria Arellanes/Skmpark Peer Review

General info
Wiki Username: Skmpark

I. Which article are you evaluating?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kporras5/Gloria_Arellanes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gloria_Arellanes

II. Evaluate the article

Evaluate the article using the following rubric. Note, you do not need to leave comments for each question. Use the comments boxes to elaborate on notable successes or highlight key shortcomings of the article.

Lead section
A good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview. A reader who just wants to identify the topic can read the first sentence. A reader who wants a very brief overview of the most important things about it can read the first paragraph. A reader who wants a quick overview can read the whole lead section.

Content
A good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another.

Tone and Balance
Wikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible.

Sources and References
A Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books.

Organization and writing quality
The writing should be clear and professional, the content should be organized sensibly into sections.

Images and Media
III. Overall impressions

In ~200 words, address the following four questions below.


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Include your summaries here and on the author’s talk page.

I really enjoyed reading this article, especially because I didn’t know who Gloria Arellanes was previously. I find this article fairly well along its way to being well-developed. I thought that the Brown Berets section was especially interesting and well fleshed out, and I love how you linked to the Brown Berets Wikipedia page. Within the lead section, it may be helpful to provide a couple of short descriptions of Brown Berets, Las Adelitas, The Chicano Movement, and Chicana Feminism. While many of the facts are connected with citations, it would strengthen your Wikipedia article to add citations to make sure each sentence has a verifiable source. I was also really intrigued by Las Adelitas, and I would love to learn more. It would be really wonderful if you added more to this section and provided more context about what the group did and what their impact was. This article is really impressive because it brings attention to an activist figure who is often not talked about, and I would love to see more about where Gloria is now or, if she has passed away, some more about what the impacts of her life have been, along with a photo of her.

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)