User:Kpurple/Getting to Happy/Lillyroehrig Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I loved the background you provided on the Wikipedia page. It gives what I believe is some crucial and significant background to the characters of your selected text. The lead was not edited by my peer, but it doesn't appear to need any sort of revisions. I would advise that the plot summary needs revision, as it appears to contain some figurative language that is not suitable for a Wikipedia page. Additionally, it appears to be too short and undetailed. The infobox that you added is very helpful and the image is relevant to the topic. For what you added, the sources are relevant to the topic, as you even added the book as a source. I would be cautious about using Entertainment Weekly as a source for the page, as it is sometimes a "gossip" type magazine, but in the context you use it I believe it is perfectly fine. If anything were to be added to this page, I would recommend a more detailed plot summary and possibly even reception to the book. I feel these would help flesh out the page a bit more.