User:Kratinaha/Chemical communication in insects/Gupton99 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kratinaha


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Kratinaha/Chemical communication in insects
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Chemical communication in insects
 * Chemical communication in insects

Evaluate the drafted changes
I know were all getting started and don't have much in the sandbox yet, so Ill do my best to evaluate what you have now :). Im a little confused on how you're planning to organize this. I think it would be a good idea to separate each pheromone based on their function and have a paragraph on each one of those- like you said attraction, defense and marking territory and can add if theres more. Then add the compound in the pheromone if it has been identified and the mechanism. Also you could then add more info on the behavior the pheromone triggers. If they all have the same or a similar mechanism then that can be a separate paragraph as well. Im sorry Im not sure how far along you are or if you already have a better plan! Again, I know you already know this, but need sources!

Response to Review
Thank you, Grayson, for you review. I am indeed still at a very early stage of my process. I like your suggestions for the structure. Best Kratinaha (talk) 19:33, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Peer Review 2
You need to add references in the intro. Also maybe move the picture higher up in the article because one of them is down in the references so many people won't notice it. Maybe change "Pheromones are of two main kinds" to "There are two main types of pheromones." I think this may read better. Overall, I think everything is pretty straight forward and clear.