User:Krator/Sandbox3

In the recent Arbitration Committee case, a "broader disagreement regarding the interpretation of notability guidelines with reference to fictional and popular culture topics"i was identified. This essay aims to be a guide to debates that are part of this broader disagreement, by identifying arguments to be avoided and questions to be considered. This is in no way a replacement for WP:Notability (fiction). Rather, it aims to take a different approach to

Premises

 * 1) Notability is not inherited.
 * 2) Notability is indefensible/Harmlessness is not an argument
 * 3) Harmlessness is not an argument.
 * 4) Discussion is warranted for each case.

Three questions
Rephrase!
 * 1) If this topic were optimally covered in Wikipedia, would the length of that coverage warrant an article of its own?

Structure this broader disagreement.

Premises: