User:Kregea/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Wind power in Pennsylvania)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(I chose wind power because it seemed to have the least amount of information for an already existing webpage.)

Evaluate the article
(The lead section is incredibly vague and the information is out of date. There is some general, overarching information, but not as detailed or encompassing as it should be. Many sources are missing and say "citation needed." The organization was good; the sections were ordered in a way that made sense. The media also aligned with the article well. There is nothing for the talk page. The tone seems neutral; there does not appear to be bias for or against wind power. My overall impression is that it is a weak article and can be strengthened by more precise, updated, and accurate information.)