User:Krg0302/Epizootic hemorrhagic disease/Ryl3rs0n Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * (Krg0302)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Krg0302/Epizootic hemorrhagic disease
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Epizootic hemorrhagic disease
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Epizootic hemorrhagic disease

Content

 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes - could maybe be simplified a bit for someone who doesn't know as much about EHD
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * yes! great inclusion of more recent findings and details

Tone and Balance

 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No! Great job balancing the northern and southern focus
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No and no biases

Sources and References

 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * yes, just needs transferred from manual in-text citations to Wikipedia linked citations
 * Are the sources current?
 * yes! They are all from the last 20 years, and two of them are within the past 5 years!
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Try adding a link or two (for other articles and terms)!

Organization

 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Very well written and impressive!
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Geographic Distribution:
 * Nondetectable -> undetectable
 * Add Citation where 'needs citation' History:
 * 2021). -> move period
 * SNP's -> elaborate on if not done in earlier in/on original article
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * yes! great job leading up to the current day in the history section - smooth transition into ongoing information in article

Images and Media

 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * No images in edited draft or original article - a non-graphic picture would be a great addition, if time

"Overall - Amazing job! The level of articulation in what you added to the original draft are impressive. Just get those citations added and small edits made! I do think some interactive additions like links and/or pictures would make this article a lot less intimidating to the general public, but not necessary."