User:KrisM148/Filipino Americans/Gingyrael Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? KrisM148
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:KrisM148/Filipino Americans

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation
The content is relevant to the overarching topic and all is relatively, up-to-date. I think all the content is relevant; however, I think the second paragraph seems a little less relevant than the others.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
The added content appears neutral and considers multiple point of views such as american-born Filipinos and those born in the Philippines.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
The links and sources work and are relatively current. They back up the content added.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
The added content was very clear and didn't have any spelling or grammar mistakes from what I could read. The last paragraph could have been split up into two different sentences in order to read easier.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
The content definitely added to the quality of the Wikipedia article by adding additional information about religion's influence on Filipino Americans.