User:Kris m123/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Apoptosis
 * Article Evaluation
 * The articles content is all relevant to the topic, its mentions necrosis which may confuse some readers since this page is suppose to be all about apoptosis. Also the frog apoptosis section may not be needed. It is written neutrally. The claims are cited correctly. The citations look to be reliable, and the links to them work. Has a lot of references which is great (110).
 * The articles content is all relevant to the topic, its mentions necrosis which may confuse some readers since this page is suppose to be all about apoptosis. Also the frog apoptosis section may not be needed. It is written neutrally. The claims are cited correctly. The citations look to be reliable, and the links to them work. Has a lot of references which is great (110).


 * Sources
 * http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.896.2038&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Option 2

 * Metastasis
 * Article Evaluation
 * This article has a lot of information, but it is all relevant to the topic of metastasis. It is written neutrally. The claims are cited correctly and seem reliable. For the amount of information present I thought there would be more sources, but those references seem to be enough. The links to the sources work.
 * This article has a lot of information, but it is all relevant to the topic of metastasis. It is written neutrally. The claims are cited correctly and seem reliable. For the amount of information present I thought there would be more sources, but those references seem to be enough. The links to the sources work.


 * Sources
 * https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/%28SICI%291097-0142%2819971015%2980%3A8%2B%3C1529%3A%3AAID-CNCR2%3E3.0.CO%3B2-F

Option 3

 * Airborne transmission
 * Article Evaluation
 * The articles content seems to be all relevant to the topic, however, there has been some confusion to the readers due to the wording of the article between the differences between airborne transmission and droplet transmission, so a critique would be to be more clear at explaining this concept. The article is written neutrally. The claims in this article are mostly cited correctly, however there are a few claims that are missing a citation under the transmission title. The references seem reliable. The links work to these references.
 * The articles content seems to be all relevant to the topic, however, there has been some confusion to the readers due to the wording of the article between the differences between airborne transmission and droplet transmission, so a critique would be to be more clear at explaining this concept. The article is written neutrally. The claims in this article are mostly cited correctly, however there are a few claims that are missing a citation under the transmission title. The references seem reliable. The links work to these references.


 * Sources
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7580955/, https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsif.2009.0407.focus

Option 4

 * Anxiolytic
 * Article Evaluation
 * The articles content seems to be all relevant to the topic, as it lists the different anxiolytic drugs. It is written neutrally. The claims are not cited very well, as there is medical references missing and too many primary sources cited. The citations look reliable for the most part, however like I said missing reliable medical references for some of the statements. The links to the references do work.
 * The articles content seems to be all relevant to the topic, as it lists the different anxiolytic drugs. It is written neutrally. The claims are not cited very well, as there is medical references missing and too many primary sources cited. The citations look reliable for the most part, however like I said missing reliable medical references for some of the statements. The links to the references do work.


 * Sources
 * https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0024320585903741

Option 5

 * P53
 * Article Evaluation
 * There is a ton of information in this article, and it all is relevant to the topic of P53. It is written neutrally. The claims are all cited correctly, and the reference work to click on. This article has tons of sources (223), which is awesome to get information from different sources to get different ideas and views.
 * There is a ton of information in this article, and it all is relevant to the topic of P53. It is written neutrally. The claims are all cited correctly, and the reference work to click on. This article has tons of sources (223), which is awesome to get information from different sources to get different ideas and views.


 * Sources
 * https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1383574208000811