User:KristinSefcik28/Profundal zone/TaylorRclantonPrice Peer Review

Lead

 * The article has been updated by peer and has a proper introductory sentence to the topic.

Content

 * The content is relevant and updated.
 * There are a lot of organisms that could be added to this article that exist in the profundal zone. there were not really examples listed or mentioned.
 * You could add a section talking the ecological importance of organisms living in the profundal zone.
 * You could also add a section talking about current studies or how climate change effects the profundal zone.

Tone and Balance

 * There is no bias, everything is very neutral

Sources and References

 * All the sources seemed to be appropriately sourced.
 * Links to sources worked appropriately.
 * No sources in the first paragraph were used. You may consider adding sources to back information so people may confirm the information is accurate.
 * All sources are recently updated.

Organization

 * information is organized and concise
 * I did not see grammatical errors or spelling errors

Images and Media

 * Images or media could be used to improve this article, but none were used. A good example would be pictures of the profundal zone, organisms, or the different littoral or sublittoral zones.

Overall Impressions
The article is overall informative and concise and adds a great amount of information to the article that benefits it. There could be more mention of organisms that live there or more examples of them as well as ecological importance. There could also be mention of current topics or issues relating to the profundal zone.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)