User:Kristinapham/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Forensic anthropology.

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Forensic anthropology was chosen because I have a basic understanding of the forensic discipline. As a result, this article may include some topics I'm familiar with and thus I can provide a more accurate evaluation.

Evaluate the article
Overall, the article is relatively concise, but includes some information that may not be necessary. It provides sufficient information on each topic and has an organized structure, making it simple to navigate.

The content has a neutral stand-point and is written in a language that is not complicated to understand. However, as mentioned in the talk page, the article covers forensic anthropology information almost entirely from the USA or Canada which is to be expanded internationally. There is still so many different approaches in editing this article.

The general trend of the article is in good shape, but as do many articles on Wikipedia, could use better and a wider range of sources; like the list of anthropologists, for example. As the talk page is known to be of importance, my main suggestion is to take note of the topics mentioned.