User:Krone035/Low-Nutrient, Low-Chlorophyll (LNLC) Regions/Meyergr Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Owned by anne


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Low-Nutrient Low-Chlorophyll


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * The page does not yet exist

Evaluate the drafted changes
I thought your article had a great flow to it, and the sections are all in a good place. Reading through it, the content looks neutral, and does not have biases. The citations utilized are peer reviewed or from a reliable source and are plentiful. I really like the section about changes in LNLC regions, I think that's very interesting and good to include in the article. All of the sections seem well balanced, and there isn't one section that sticks out because it has too much or too little content. One thing to look into is the citation format, sometimes the citation is after a period, sometimes before. The size fraction was described for picoplankton, but not nano- and microplankton which could be useful. There could also be a bit more information added to the lead to paint a clear picture of what the article will focus on.