User:Krrky/Bauxite/Alexpope01 Peer Review

General info
Krrky
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Krrky/Bauxite
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Bauxite

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The lead section of the article is clear and concise with a strong opening sentence. It clearly describes what bauxite is and provides a general background of the chemistry. It doesn't include a general overview of the major sections which could be added. Overall though, this is a great lead section that provides a lot of detail.

Content

The content that was added is relevant to the topic and content is up to date. Although there are some references that are slightly old (ex: published in 2006), the information retrieved from these references is still relevant. There doesn't seem to be any content missing or anything that doesn't belong. Also, from my knowledge, this topic does not deal with any of WIkipedia's equity gaps and it does not address any topics related to historically underrepresented populations.

Tone and Balance

The tone of the content added, as well as the article as a whole, is written in a neutral tone and does not try and sway the reader in a particular direction. The content added is not opinionated as it presents facts that were retrieved by credible, peer reviewed sources. The viewpoints are neither overrepresented nor underrepresented.

Sources and References

All of the content is backed up by reliable sources. The content does accurately reflect what the sources describe so there is no misinformation being spread. Most of the sources are current (published within the last 5 years) but some sources are much older (published in the early 2000's) so although there is a lot of up to date information, there is still some older information that may or may not be relevant anymore. There is also a diverse spectrum of authors which makes the articles more trustworthy. Also, the links work so that's also great.

Organization

The content written is clear, concise, and easy to read. From when I read it, there didn't seem to be any grammatical errors and everything is nicely layed out in an organized way.