User:Krunchynoodles/80/20 housing/Cgb52 Peer Review

General info
Krunchynoodles
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Article - User:Krunchynoodles/80/20 housing::Bibliography - User:Krunchynoodles/80/20 housing/Bibliography

Evaluate the drafted changes
Content: The program's fundamentals are covered, along with eligibility standards and the two ways to be eligible for tax-free money. To improve the breadth of coverage, further details regarding the program's influence and efficacy, difficulties or criticisms encountered, and instances of particular innovations that have made use of the program should be added.

Accuracy: Based on the references provided, it seems that the details presented regarding New York City's 80/20 housing scheme are valid an unbiased. The description of the program is supported by the outlined requirements, which include reserving a set percentage of units for households at particular income levels.

Source Reliability: The inclusion of sources from reputable institutions such as the NYU Furman Center and scholarly articles adds credibility to the information presented. The sources cited are relevant to the topic and provide detailed information about the 80/20 housing program in New York City.

Clarity: Most of the text is comprehensible and clear, however there are a few places where the wording may be improved. Rephrasing the text "There are two options for multifamily rental developments that wish to qualify for tax-free funding through the 80/20 housing program" could be rephrased to make it  a smoother read.

Objectivity: There is no evident expression of opinion or preference in the excerpt. It simply states the criteria for qualification and eligibility for the 80/20 housing program without making any judgments or advocating for a particular viewpoint. The language used is clear and objective, focusing on presenting the details of the program in a straightforward manner.

Organization: The information is provided in a systematic manner and is logically organized throughout. Subheadings, however, would help the section better distinguish between various facets of the 80/20 housing scheme, including qualifying requirements, advantages, and drawbacks. There is no evidence of bias or opinionated description anywhere throughout the article.

The Wikipedia entry is made more credible overall by the bibliography, which combines institutional and peer-reviewed academic sources. It discusses various facets of the 80/20 housing initiative, including how it was implemented, what effect it had, and how it fit into the overall housing picture in New York City.