User:Kryn96/Early Ceramic Period (Kansas)/Q945E965 Peer Review

From Easton Vogt:

3 Positives-


 * The use of the subheadings is well organized and easy to follow. They have clear concise topics.
 * There's great usage of references throughout the wiki page, which makes it feel well researched.
 * The article doesn't feel repetitive in format, even though some of the same subjects are discussed in different sections. This make it more entertaining to read.

3 Areas for Improvement-


 * Having a subheading specifically on Kansas contributions to the early ceramic period could be used.
 * Add a few pictures if needed, like examples of pottery.
 * Provide an estimated date for when the early ceramic period started and ended, instead of its proximity to different eras. Ex: 60,000 yrs ago

3 Suggestions for Improvement-


 * Try to not use words like "You" and "we" in order to sound more academic.
 * Remove line about Hopewell crops under the Transformation subheading to avoid repetition.
 * Avoid doubtful language like "Seems", "Likely", etc.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)