User:Ks9357/Dixie D'Amelio/Slomo321 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

I am reviewing Ks9357's article on Dixie D'Amelio


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ks9357/Dixie_D%27Amelio?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead is really good; the user provides brief information about the celebrity, and her relationship to Charli D'Amelio. The lead also provides the most recent information about her (Dixie shaving her head for a YouTube video this year). However, there are no sections to the article yet, so, it's still left in the air until he or she adds them. In addition, the lead does not only include information about the celebrity, the lead is the article, so again, it's still left in the air until he or she adds information to the body paragraphs.

The content is absolutely relevant to the topic, and up-to-date. There is no missing content nor any equity gaps.

The content added is neutral, and do not overrepresent or underrepresent any viewpoints, and do not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position over the other.

All the content is backed up by a reliable secondary source of information, and accurately reflect what the cited sources say. The content is also current, well-organized, and are written by a diverse set of authors.

There are no images or media yet.

The article meets Wikipedia's nobility requirements, and the list of sources accurately represent all available literature on the subject. It also link to other articles so that it is more discoverable. However, the article does not yet follow the patterns of other similar articles.

Overall, I would say the article on Charli D'Amelio has a really great head-start. There needs to be more information on the celebrity and nearly all existing ones should be pushed down to the body paragraphs, since everything is on the lead paragraph. The strength of the article, though, is great. I would say keep working on it; you're doing very good on it so far!