User:Kshah786/Parveen Shakir/Quinterose Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Kshah768
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Kshah786/Parveen Shakir

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
The Lead is not shown in this draft.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation
''The three sections shown are very relevant and up-to-date. I think the sections of Shakir's style of is very well detailed and well thought out. You do very good job at explaining how her style of writing appeals to a female audience.''

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
''All sections are overall neutral in tone. I think there is a good use of facts and quotes in your writing that help keep the tone neutral.''

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
''All links are up-to-date and working. All sources are throughout and have extensive writing and detail on the subject.''

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
''I believe your sections are well-written and easy to read. No grammatical errors overall. Making a Free Verse a subsection to Style of Poetry makes the subtopics easy to find and read.''

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to ƒt copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
No pictures displayed

New Article Evaluation
Not a new article.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
Your contributions are very educational and well-written. I believe these contributions will be a very valuable addition to the existing article. I think that making an additional subsection to the main section (Style of poetry) could be valuable if there are other styles not yet mentioned. Overall, these contributions make the article more complete.