User:Kspieker20/sandbox

Realism
Complex interdependence has been labeled "the opposite of realism". In many ways complex interdependence pushes back against classical realist logic, such as the interdependent relationship between Canada and the United States. Neither country feels threatened by each other given their relationship of shared values and goals. Realist logic would state that the vying of power would have both states constantly competing with each other for security, but under complex interdependence logic this is not the case. Keohane and Nye see complex interdependence as often a more accurate representation of reality than classical realism, but claim that most situations fall in between the two ideal portraits. Force remains applicable in many states around the world, including many third world countries. In situations like these, realism is a more applicable concept. Though Keohane and Nye see complex interdependence as often more realistic than realism, they recognize that realism remains relevant in many current situations.

Neorealism is given the same treatment, considered as a separate yet valid theory for appropriate situations. Neorealism and realism are considered relevant in third world states where states are trying to maximize their strengths and thus gain power. Complex interdependence remains prevalent in the other side of the world where nations are looking to create economic gains for themselves and push conflict to the side.