User:Ksq4/sandbox

Article evaluation
Article Title: Coeliac disease

Yes, everything in the article is relevant to me. Nothing distracted me. The article appears neutral. I don't see any claims that are biased. In the Social/Culture section, the relation that western religions have to coeliac's disease is overrepresented given that there's just one line about Coeliac Awareness Month and then the rest of the section is a subsection entitled Christian churches and the Eucharist. The links work and the sources support the claims in the article. Each fact is referenced with an appropriate reliable reference. The information comes from mostly medical (gastroenterology journals). These are neutral sources. None of the information is out of date. The Social and Culture subsection could be expanded on though. In the Talk Page a lot of the edits that people discuss involve what would be the the best wording for certain statements and what would make sentences less redundant. This article is rated FA-Class on the quality scale and High-Importance. This article is part of WikiProjects Medicine. Wikipedia differs in the way Coeliac's diseased is discussed in class because the article goes into more detail about the disease and discusses this disease from other perspectives besides just nutritional and medical.

Week 5 Article Tentative Improvements
Article Title: Probiotic Article Title: Health effects of wine Article Title: Breast milk
 * The subsection on the effects that probiotics have on blood pressure could be developed further to include more detail and evidence.
 * More information regarding the connection between light drinking and cancer mortality could be included in the subsection titled cancer.
 * Underneath the section about the benefits of breast milk could be subsections that expand on the varying benefits that consuming breast milk have.

Week 8 Sources (Module 3 Assignment)

 * A systematic review of the literature associating breastfeeding with type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes.
 * There is an association between breastfeeding for at least 2 months and a decreased risk in child-onset diabetes.
 * This conclusion is was derived after the authors did a systematic review of observational studies.
 * Long-term impact of neonatal breastfeeding on childhood adiposity and fat distribution among children exposed to diabetes in utero.
 * If children are adequately breastfed, they are protected against increased body fat and childhood obesity, risk factors for diabetes.
 * Does breastfeeding influence the risk of developing diabetes mellitus in children? A review of current evidence.
 * This non-systematic review emphasizes that human breast milk contains active substances that could promote energy and fullness, possibly protecting against type 2 diabetes.
 * Early infant feeding and risk of type 1 diabetes mellitus-a nationwide population-based case-control study in pre-school children.
 * Breastfeeding for a long period was categorized as breastfeeding for 5 or more months as opposed to early bottle-feeding characterized by less than 2 weeks.
 * Infant feeding (feeding with food that's not breast milk) is associated with a higher risk of developing Type 1 diabetes.