User:Kt1628/Uranium mining and the Navajo people/Trufflehunter5 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kt1628


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Kt1628/Uranium mining and the Navajo people


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Uranium mining and the Navajo people

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Your article includes many good pieces of information that pertain to your topic. The lead of the article gives a good overview but seems overly detailed with the amount of information provided. The added edits remain neutral and rely on factual information which helps strengthen the article. Adding how "Farmers lost 75% of their crops due to the lack of clean water" helps convey the severity of the issue and the struggle of the Navajo people. Citing a source directly afterwards also strengthens the argument. The sources you have cited seem reliable and support the information you added. The citation to the EPA Standard Form 95 is a great addition because it shows how the issue is still impacting people today. Overall, the information you have added is important to understanding the topic and adds to the article. The information touches on a large social issue as well as the legal implications surrounding it which will help readers understand the wide range of implications uranium mining.

Some content I would consider adding pertain to the Standard Form 95. I would include information about how much compensation the Navajo people have received through this form and how long of a process it actually is. I would also suggest a number or percentage amount of lung cancer cases among the Navajo people to stress how prevalent of an issue it is in reality.