User:Ktashkulov/Poppers/Milest303 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username): Ktashkulov
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Ktashkulov/Poppers

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? No
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? I would say it is concise, for the most part

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes, all sources cited are from the 21st century
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? All content belongs. However, I think content is missing regarding the 21st century resurgence. Not enough information is added regarding context.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Mostly. There looks to be several sources that are single studues, but most are referencing reviews
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Mostly. They are all from the 21st century with the oldest cited from 2001
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, all work

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Yes
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Adding a section on sex risks is very important, but I still feel there is more that could be added. As a whole, not much of the article has changed.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? It helps clearer identify potential users of poppers, and makes it very clear what sex risks come with poppers. Previously the risks were not emphasized enough.
 * How can the content added be improved? I think there really needs to be more content. The additions do not seem substantial enough for what could said. Consider adding more on side effects, as well as link on HIV/Aids.