User:Ktjylee/Ecosystem engineer/Dalastrascastrejon Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Ktjylee


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Ktjylee/Ecosystem engineer
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Ecosystem engineer

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I believe that the content you included has improved and added to the article in a beneficial way. I also think that the content is very well written, is easy to read and has a neutral tone. Below I listed some things that you could change to make the article even stronger.

Citations: Not all the information is backed by evidence (there are some citations missing). Additionally, some of the citations are on the older side, are there any new and relevant articles out there?

Wording: This is a minor detail, but at some point you say, "It was said," which sounds a bit weird in a wikipedia article.

Controversy section: In the controversy section, you could include the research being conducted that would create a better definition of "ecosystem engineer".

Lead: I would recommend looking over the lead and perhaps revising it to match some of the new information you added.

Table: I would also look over the table you included. One could argue that this table may be biased and outdated.