User:Ktrkeller/Yellow Bluffs Site/Jessicaduran1809 Peer Review

General info

 * Author: Ktrkeller
 * Link to draft: User:Ktrkeller/Yellow Bluffs Site

Lead evaluation
Their lead was very concise and a great introduction to the article. I feel they could benefit in briefly mentioning the significance of the finding the site in their lead. Adding a small section to provide a brief description of the articles major sections could also help the reader have a better idea of what they are getting into. Overall, it was a a great lead.

Content evaluation
The content added was relevant to their topic. They mention excavation of the site as well as mapping and site occupation. I believe the content was up to date and all the content seem to relate to the topic and flow. I think they can also benefit from adding a separate section to discuss the findings and their significance a little more rather than have it all together in the site occupation section. Overall, great content.

Tone and balance evaluation
The content they added had a neutral tone and do not appear to hold biases toward a particular position. The content does not seem to be persuading anyone to a specific position. I would like see more of the perspective from the archaeologists and their interpretations of the finds if it's available in the article they have.

Sources and references evaluation
They used the article professor Melton provided so it is credible.

Organization evaluation
The topic is well written and easy to read. There does not seem to be ant grammatical or spelling errors. They only have two sections of the topics they are discussing and I think the flow of the article would go better if they have more sections to discussion the different topics in their article.

Images and media evaluation
N/A

New Article Evaluation
I believe it does meet the New article requirements seeing as they are using the sources we were told to utilize.

Overall evaluation
I believe this article overall is off to a great start. It is very concise and detailed while maintaining a neutral tone. They can benefit from adding more topic sections instead of having it all together, but overall it is good.