User:Kuban kazak/2007 3

I`m surprised.
How do you like this:    --Russianname 16:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't overpressure him, instead remove from his talk page. In any case I think he got your message and if that how he responds to it then so be it. You can't force him to retain passages on his talk page. If however he persists with disruptive behaivour raise it on WP:AN/I. --Kuban Cossack 17:05, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Russians in Ukraine
You have been blocked for continuing the sterile edit warring with Hillock65 at Russians in Ukraine. As I asked you both before, please use some kind of dispute resolution, like WP:RFM instead of just battling it out with repeated reversions. Furthermore, calling other editors' edits vandalism, as you did here, when they are not is considered uncivil; please use other polite methods for describing edits you disagree with. Dmcdevit·t 20:45, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Podilsko-Voskresenska Line
Hi, regarding the ongoing content dispute at Talk:Podilsko-Voskresenska Line, comments such as "Ukraine can choose to continue its linguistic genocide all it wants" and "people, who driven by their in-superiority complexes..." can be considered by people as personal attacks or as being against certain nationality. Please assume good faith and do not make such statements which have an accusatory tone. Also, when in content discussion, please do not blindly keep reverting to your version of an article. Please talk it out. Doing this makes the article unstable, which is detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia. 3RR violation is a serious issue, and repeated violation would bring even stricter penalties. Please talk out whatever problems you have with other editors. Remember, we do not own any article. They are maintained collectively by the community, not any one individual. Thats why we have to follow consensus. --soum talk 07:46, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Mediation case
Hi,. I've decided to take on your medcab case. If you have any concerns about this, please tell me, otherwise I look forward to resolving the case with you. - G  1  ggy  Talk/Contribs 05:36, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Mediation case
Hello, Kuban cossack. Just posting to let you know that I won't be involving myself in your mediation case, as I want to remain impartial and don't really have anything to contribute beyond the third opinion. But I hope that it brings a positive outcome for both you and Alex. Kind regards,  Adrian  M. H.  22:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Well thank you for the participation you gave. --Kuban Cossack 23:31, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

I added a statement of my own. Thanks.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:38, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

What's up with this?
Dude... I'm really disappointed. Can't believe you're trying to make the dispute bigger. — Alex(U 02:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Another mediation case
Hello! I will be mediating another MedCab case you're named in, and I would greatly appreciate it if you could explain your point of view of the situation. Thank you! (messedrocker • talk) 03:02, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

How kind of you
So returning grammatical mistakes is good quality, as is putting it later on WP:AN/I. Let I remind you that you left the Medcab instead of continuing to search for consensus in that article, yet you don't mind reverting again and again. That is low и подло... --Kuban Cossack 16:17, 19 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Don't have the guts to insult me in English? :-) — Alex(U 02:19, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Request for Mediation
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Requests for mediation/Podilsko-Voskresenska Line, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible. — Alex(U 02:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

RFC/USER discussion concerning you (Kuban kazak)
Hello, Kuban kazak. Please be aware that a request for comments has been filed concerning your conduct on Wikipedia. The RFC entry can be found by your name in this list, and the actual discussion can be found at Requests for comment/Kuban kazak, where you may want to participate. — Alex(U 23:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I will not. WRT to our dispute until you allow a WP:DR to fully finish without hiding under your svidomy co-patriots, there is no need to jump any guns. WRT everything else, I am not going lower myself into reading the PA entries of AlexPU, Hillock or the soon to join likes of Ukrained and AndriyK how they express their frustration on not being able to push their hardcore POVs into wikipedia, and to avenge all the past times когда их отхлестали по самые неболуйся (и правильно сделали). So I reject to enter into this pointless excuse for setting a vendetta against me.
 * Just for the record however, do mention how you left the medcab prematurely. It seems like a fine piece of evidence for a user who really wants consensus. Maybe I should launch an equal one against you, but alas revenge is not my personality (as a wikipedian), it would be silly although it might get a bit more responses in my favour, (from users who are not for one open trolls)...
 * Эх жалким ты оказался, в жизни будет одиноко. А этот "прикол" еще открывает в тебе черту труса.... Че на РФц остановился, давай сразу арбитраж...Чудо в перьях...:D --Kuban Cossack 20:51, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Privet
I've looked through Central Armed Forces Museum article. It looks nice. I think, for futher expansion we should find good Wiki articles on museums in other countries to have some hints on their structure. I've presented one example at Talk:Central Armed Forces Museum, but it may well be, that better examples exist. Cmapm 00:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Maidan Nezalezhnosti (Kiev Metro)
What do you have to say about this? That's one of your favorite sources. So much for "Ploschad Nezavisimosti". — Alex(U 04:24, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't even think about mentioning this site. It says L'vovskaja Brama. — Alex(U 04:46, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * FYI, a template which I wrote in ru-wiki...:)--Kuban Cossack 17:50, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Request for Mediation
This message delivered: 08:17, 21 June 2007 (UTC).

Request for arbitration
I have submitted a repquest for arbitration on User:Kuban kazak here. As an individual who was involved in this dispute, your participation would be appreciated. Thank you. — Alex(U 23:27, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Your move
Just wondering, what are the grounds for this move? Belarussian has a Latin alphabet, and Wikipedia's names are based on it. Same for the Polish city names (you don't see Łódź being moved to Wodzh). — Alex(U 04:47, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Maybe I'm wrong... The Lacinka article says it's historic. And there's no Romanization of Belarussian. — Alex(U 04:50, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Wikistalking
Look who's stalking who. Doing a Google search for "Kuban kazak" and "Wikipedia", eh? The RfC is still going on, and RfAr will be refiled soon, but only if you don't change within the next few days. Don't mess up the chance I gave you, show us that you can change. And instead of accusing people of stalking and keeping up POV pushing and edit warring, start making contributions to articles that are of more value. Wikipedia is not a place for disruptive users.

By the way, it would be considered stalking if I was editing articles that aren't within my span of interest (Ukraine, subway systems, computing, airplanes, language, etc...). Please realize that while some users might go out of their way to harass somebody (they get banned quickly), I am not one of them. People who accuse others of harassing can also be considered a form of harassment. — Alex(U 03:23, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Transliteration policy
As a member of WikiProject Ukraine, you are invited to participate in the discussion about transliteration of Ukrainian words. I would appreciate your participation. Discussion is located here. Thank you. — Alex(U 17:52, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Russophobia
See my intervention at []. I think that in order to justify the title, we need better examples. I think User:AndriyK has now unwittingly given a good example of it. Agree? --Pan Gerwazy 15:30, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Your revert of History of Christianity in Ukraine
Could you please explain your recent edit? Please point the section where the passage was commented out. Thanks.--AndriyK 18:22, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * A year at least . --Kuban Cossack 18:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Could you please explaine the reasons on the article talk page?--AndriyK 18:30, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Are they not clear enough, it's a loose paragraph that managed to remain in the text for god knows how long from the original stub version of that article. It carries no information that is not presented elsewhere in the article and there is also not a single ref attached to it. Do we need it? --Kuban Cossack 18:32, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * It does carry some information that is not presented elsewhere in the article. Concerning lack of references, there is a more friendly way of dealing with the problem: just add a tag and wait for some reasonable time (a week or even more).--AndriyK 18:51, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speculation is not information, it is a summary, and an empty one. In any case if that is so then extract the information from the heading (if you can find it) and purge everything else. --Kuban Cossack 20:05, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Kiev Metro
I'm going to Ukraine in a few days. Can you make me a list of needed photos for Kiev Metro articles? Thanks. — Alex(U 00:44, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Russophobia
An article that you have been involved in editing, Russophobia, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Russophobia. Thank you. -- Jreferee  (Talk) 01:46, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Betrayal of the Cossacks
Привет! Что ты думаешь о моих предложениях тут? Alæxis¿question? 12:51, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

RFC/USER Russianname
A Request for Comment on User:Russianname has been filed. As user, who had experience of dealing with this individual your comments on this RfC would be appreciated. Thank you. --Hillock65 14:35, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Request to move to Kyiv
Hello,

I have set up a request to move the page Kiev to Kyiv.

I have outlined four key reasons for doing so in the discussion section of the page.

Looking through the archives, I saw that you had contributed to this page earlier. I would like to hear what you have to say on this topic.

Thank you

Horlo 02:53, 30 July 2007 (UTC)Horlo

Anti-Russian sentiment
Please take a closer look at your recent edit. When you revereted across multiple revisions you put some vandalism back in the article which had been removed earlier in the day. --StuffOfInterest 19:18, 1 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Regarding, my grievances are listed, and a solution -- providing the relevant context -- is proposed. Where are you in the discussion? Digwuren 21:42, 1 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't care about your grievance or the ongoing discussion. I am only referring to your multi-revision revert which reintroduced blatant vandalism which had been previously removed.  Look at the bottom of the edit linked above.  Did you intent to say that someone was "Stalin's gay partner"?  When reverting across multiple revisions, please make sure you are not putting something back in which should not have been there. --StuffOfInterest 01:20, 2 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Ugg, just realized I'm responding to the wrong person. Sorry, nevermind. --StuffOfInterest 01:42, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Your edits to Talk:Kiev/naming
Hi. Please don't change another person's heading on a talkpage, as you did here. That's both rude and misleading. If the heading doesn't fit your own sentiments, there's no need to post under it—start your own section. I ask you to self-revert and restore the original heading. Please. Bishonen | talk 23:12, 2 August 2007 (UTC).

Support
Could I get your support on this Category:Musicians born in Ukraine, has been nominated for deletion. The discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007_July_31. The discussion was opened on July 31, and will probably close in two days, so if you wish to make a case for retaining the category, Thanks --Bandurist 04:53, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Award


Russians in Ukraine
Hello. I think that now the article Russians in Ukraine could now get a higher rate then Start-Class on the quality scale. Hope you agree abd could give it a higher rating. M.V.E.i. 09:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the upgrade! M.V.E.i. 17:49, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

I added you to a new category
I added your user-page to the new category i've created, Russian Wikipedians. M.V.E.i. 18:46, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Article
Hi! Here's an article from the "Le Monde Diplomatique" which you may find useful as a source for some Wikipedia articles (the original will be available later in the magazine's archive, I presume). Alæxis¿question? 05:21, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Problems with Hillock in the Russians in Ukraine article
In the section Ukraine after the dissolution of the Soviet Union i have a conflict with Hillock. He deleted the information i write about the Russian Cultural Center in Lviv being vandelized all the time. He deletes my See also: Anti-Russian sentiment in Ukraine, above the section. And he claimes that this image: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:AntiRussianPoster.jpg

cant fit their because "it's rational doesnt fit" or somthing like this, thought the uploader of the photo added a rational that i belive fits, and i added their also. I'm not the first user who tries to add this image their, ass i can see on the talk page Irpen tried to add it to. Which means, Hillock is practicaly acting as a dictator. I wouldnt bother you on this if he wouldnt have this line in the messege that he left on my user-pages talk-page: as a sign of good faith, I suggest you remove it yourself, otherwise I will have to report this to the admins.

So thats why i turn to you, to an asministrator who was very active in the writing of the article and who understands the topic and knows the people involved in editing the article, to settle this down. Thank you. M.V.E.i. 20:56, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Requests for mediation/Podilsko-Voskresenska Line
Good evening (GMT time); you are being given this message, as notification of a Motion to Close Requests for mediation/Podilsko-Voskresenska Line, to which you are listed as a party. The full statement on this motion can be found on this section of the Mediation Location; if you do not agree with the closure, please post your objection in that section, where a response will be placed accordingly.

Otherwise, thank you for working towards the compromise, which has now been reached and implemented into the article. This has resulted in a successful Mediation, and an end to the dispute in question. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Kind regards, Anthøny  17:43, 13 August 2007 (UTC)