User:Kuchar2/Language of mathematics/Gmtz81902 Peer Review

The lead has been updated to reflect the content added. There is also an introductory sentence that describes the article's topic well. The lead does not include information that is not present in the article, everything in the lead has to do with the article. The lead in the article is concise. The content added is relevant to the topic and up to date and all content present belongs. The article is about math so there is no reason to be biased about anything. The content is all backed up by reliable secondary sources and the links work. The images are nice and the added information is great.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)