User:Kuhiria/Triune brain/Caprice1234 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.

Paragraph 1: At the end of the first paragraph the users kept a term "basal ganglia," which is not a term that was used by the professor or referred to in his notes. As a result, it would be clearer if they used terms such lizard brain which was used in the notes.

Paragraph 2: In the second paragraph the last sentence seems a little bit misleading, we suggest that you include a source to back it up and mention any prominent psychiatrist in the post 2000 era that sill supports the triune brain. If such sources and psychiatrists can't be found remove the sentence.

Paleomammalian complex and Neomammalian complex: The only issues with these two paragraphs is that a citation is needed at each of the final sentences of each  paragraph.

Paragraph 1 status of the model: When the article mentions the hypothesis by Terrence Deacon mention the title of the hypothesis in quotations or in brackets and provided a citation with a link to the hypothesis, incase the reader would like to find out more.

Paragraph 2 status of the model: Add a citation for the final sentence of this paragraph.

Edits make it seem more of a critique rather than a balance of criticism and adding your own sections. May be a good idea to add new information that was learned in class.