User:Kurrials/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Because of previous interest within the field of cybersecurity, I chose this article to evaluate. The Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act matters because it helps to compromise cybersecurity threats in the United States. My preliminary impression of the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act derived upon providing a superior online security system for those in the United States. By transitioning from private company based cybersecurity into government based cybersecurity, this change is made.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The beginning of the article includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic. This sentence provides the overview of the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act and leads the reader on. A brief description of the article’s major sections is present. The lead is very concise and to the point and does not contain information not contained within the article.

The content is up to date and recently updated in June of 2023.This article is based neutral as there is no right or wrong to the situation, rather what is said is only compromised of facts of the situation. There is no persuasion into whether or not the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act was valid or not and rather just a detailed overview of the topic at hand.

All of the sources derived from the article are up to date with when the act was put into place. Each article is from 2014-2015. The sources yield a vastly diverse set of authors that compose the article. Many better sources do not exist, the majority of articles that are used are valid. All links are currently working.

The article is extremely well written, concise, and easy to read in a short period of time. I was unable to find any apparent spelling errors within the article. It is well broken down into many different headings that’s give more information upon the topic.

This article does not contain images that are relevant to the subject and rather only has a picture for the title.

Conversations going on in the talk page are based upon what effects this act will have on US-EU trade. This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment.

The article’s strengths include being easy to read, ability to grasp the topic, and the shortness of the article. The article could be improved by adding a picture or two to give life to the article. The article is well-developed and would only need little added if any.