User:Kurt Krautmann/Eutrophication/Cruzb005 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kurt Krautmann


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Kurt Krautmann/Eutrophication


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Eutrophication

Evaluate the drafted changes
Content

The content included in the draft is relevant to the topic of eutrophication and there doesn't seem to be any missing content. Most of the sources included appear to be from before the 2000s which increases the risk of the information being outdated. However, the topic is heavily researched and the references support the content. The article does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps.

Tone and Balance

Most of the content added is neutral. There does not seem to be any bias towards a certain claim. All of the sections have about the same amount of information. There are no immediate viewpoints that appear overrepresented or underrepresented. The content is in a tone that is not meant to persuade the audience but meant to inform the audience.

Sources and References

All of the new content added is cited by reliable sources. The information taken from these sources seem to accurately be represented by the content within the article. Most of the sources are not current. Inclusion of a couple of more current sources could improve the article. The links to all of the sources are functional.

Organization

The content added is concise, clear, and easy to understand. The information added flows nicely together as the draft is organized well. The content does not appear to have major grammatical or spelling errors.

Images and Media

The article draft does include an image and it does enhance the readers understanding of the topic. A caption is included with the image which clearly depicts what is being shown. The image adheres to Wikipedia's copyright regulations.