User:Kurt Krautmann/Eutrophication/Metikatic Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Eutrophication)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kurt%20Krautmann/Eutrophication?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Eutrophication

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

- In the background It would be appreciated if you went over terminology instead of just introducing the issue.There are many foreign jargon in there that needs to be put into what a person who doesn't know about eutrophication can understand. Like what is Eutrophication in the first place?

-Leading up to the issue is better than just going off on your topic, set some basis to it.

-Sources look good to me

- I like the breakdown of what you are proposing to have in your main body, very focused

-Any ecological impact and environmental impact you may want to include

-What is the effect of phosphorous loads and how is that better maybe explain what was done with phosphorous load before and what bad impacts it had?

-Explanation of what flocculation is because it is kind of unclear the way you have it?

- Maybe explain more about the goal of the mechanism chosen so it is clearing it is moving phosphorous, a bit too jargon used that needs clarity

-Explain other ways phosphorous has been removed as a comparison of mechanism, this is a suggestion

-Make sure to also include images as it is related to you content

-Talk about local and overall generalized effect on our planet

-Include more details how humans are adding or removing to this phenomena