User:Kuzey Gunesli/Mycoremediation/DullestStimpy Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kuzey Gunesli


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Kuzey Gunesli/Mycoremediation


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Mycoremediation

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

Considering the lead, i do not see any changes made here regarding that so i have no comment on it. Although after reviewing it on the original article it is not too long so if you can find something interesting to add to it that would be great! The original articles lead only has a couple references also, so any you find which apply there would be of help.

ContentI see that you are adding to the organic pollutants section which is good. You added the fungi's reaction with crude oil which is quite interesting. It would be a great addition if you could add a few photos, if any are available. Photos to support your paragraph or even any photos which you could add tot he article in general would be excellent to help improve its aesthetic and give readers something to relate too.

"These species were more effective used in conjunction instead of individually, indicating that enzymes released by multiple species of fungi can act in synergy, leading to more effective degradation of crude oil." In this sentence here you say "more effective used" may i suggest the edit "more effective when used". Other than that i see no other grammatical errors.

I also see you added a completely new section which i think is a great addition to the original article. Here you mention a variety of fungi and it seems that some arent linked to additional info pages. Maybe include the links or make sure that they are working as intended? When i search those terms i find these wiki links, Metschnikowia pulcherrima, Cryptococcus,  not sure if those two links apply to the content you are adding as i am not well versed on this subject matter.

"Due to the nature of colder, remote environments like Antarctica, usual methods of contaminant remediation, such as the physical removal of contaminated media, can prove costly" Can you provide some brief examples of other remediation methods? or maybe a list of links for interested readers?

,

The only spelling mistake i see is "''Pichia carribbica" which should be spelt "Pichia caribbica". At least that is what google autocorrects for me.''

Tone and Balance

I see no issues here with regarding shifting of neutrality or that you are trying to persuade readers, so good job with that.

Sources and References

Upon reviewing some of you references I see no evidence of plagiarism. I looked over some of the abstract of this source https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-030-19030-9_26 and it seemed quite interesting. The article was quote in depth about bioremediation so it would be interesting to see what else you can draw from it in your final copy.

As i mentioned above I am not sure if these links apply, Metschnikowia pulcherrima, Cryptococcus,

Overall good work on the references, they all seem legitimate and accessible.

Organization

The organization of your article if good, I see no need to change anything.

Images and media

As I mentioned above, i think any images you can add to both the original article or you added sections would really be a huge contribution.

Overall Impression

I found this to be a good addition to the original article section on organic pollutants and i think that the new section of "Viability in Extreme Environments" is a very good addition to the article and it fits the topic very well. Now you say extreme environments here, does extreme heat apply as well? Overall though good work!

-Noah Giles/DullestStimpy