User:Kuzey Gunesli/Mycoremediation/Joq Oliver Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kuzey Gunesli


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Kuzey Gunesli/Mycoremediation


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Mycoremediation

Evaluate the drafted changes
First good work on fixing some of the sentence structure, grammar and adding links to other wiki pages, very useful. 11 February 2021

I see you have added some citations to the actual as well to previous work that was not sourced, and Good work on improving the formatting of the article.

Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
NO,

It is unnecessary for the Organic pollutants to section. It already exists in the main area, and the author is just editing it and expanding on the topic.

The Viability in Extreme Environments that the author is working on is original and should be added to the Lead section and TOC

Working on the Organic pollutants section was the right choice; it is one of the article's weaker parts, and the info you have added is informative.

The paragraph in the organic pollutants section that starts with  "Different fungi species can degrade crude oil"  is new information relevant to the section. It is well linked to other wiki articles.

Suppose I can suggest an idea to produce another source for the paragraph since it relies heavily on the same article.

The arctic used is Credible and up-to-date, published in 2014, but an additional reference would support your argument/claims.

The Viability in Extreme Environments Section is good Addition to the article, well Referenced from multiple sources, its new and original content keeps the Wikipedia page up to date.

Added wiki links to "Cryptococcus gilvescens, Cryptococcus victoriae, Pichia carribbica and Leucosporidium creatinivorum" would be a great addition.

''﻿In my first read-through, I found it a bit different to get through and understand fully. I'm am no expert on this topic.''

The paragraph is packed with information, and expanding on the topic such as ("ATP production" and "nutrient transportation disruption caused by freeze-thaw cycles") might help the readers comprehension of this section

There is a clear neutral tone in your work. Show no particular bias.

Keep up the excellent work!

I enjoy that you took your time to find interesting information and not just get as many words down as possible. The writing is good. Just keep in mind that someone with little to no background can be reading the page and try your best to simplify the more complicated aspects.