User:Kvchikka/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Mongol invasion of Kievan Rus'

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article as I am a history fan myself especially in regards to the Mongol Empire. The preliminary impression of the article was that it looked professionally written and well-organized.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The introduction to the article is overall very well written. It introduces the major topics of the article without being too descriptive or verbose, and is concise yet not overly detailed. The article itself is tonally neutral throughout, and is neither skewed towards one party or another (in this case, neither towards the Rus or the Mongols). It presents a good balance of sources from various sources, including historical anecdotes and excerpts from modern historians. The only glaring source missing is from the Mongolian side, however that may be due to factors outside of the editor's control. There is still a diversity in viewpoints presented in the article, which allows for greater academic understanding of the subject. The images are inserted purposefully and organized with captions appropriately. The talk page seems to be less professionally than the article, however that is to be expected. The sources all work and are all legitimate.