User:Kvvirginialee/Cannonball House (Macon, Georgia)/Meredithlewis13 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Kvvirginialee
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Cannonball House (Macon, Georgia)

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? unsure- if it has, I can't seem to find it.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, the introductory sentence is informative and concise.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It's concise.

==== Overall, I think the lead is a good "base." It's concise and offers important details about the Cannonball House. However, it could better layout the remainder of the article, rather than being strictly informational. ====

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, the content is relevant.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? The information is up to do- as it appears.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I think the information is sparse and in need of more detail. It's the bare minimus, so I think this is a good one to review.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes, the content is neutral and informational.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No. It's strictly informational.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No. It's basically historical.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? No. There are few sources.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? No, the sources are sparse.
 * Are the sources current? No, all the sources are old.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? No, they don't work and need to be updated.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? I do not see any added content.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? I do not see any.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? What is currently there seems to be organize, though it's sparse.

Images and Media
NO MEDIA SEEMS TO BE ADDED

For New Articles Only
NO NEW ARTICLES ADDED

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? The article appears the same.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The article appears the same.
 * How can the content added be improved? More information, better sources, more media.