User:Kwesthoff27/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Thorsen House - Wikipedia.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose the Thorsen House article because I have interest in Greene & Greene architecture and thought this was a beautifully made arts and crafts home. ￼

Evaluate the article
Lead section is concise with a good introduction to the article, information put forth is all included in the article. ￼ The content is relevant and up to date, there is much missing on the architecture of the home, and it feels as if the design of the house is completely undermined. ￼ The Article is in a neutral tone and puts forward the information in a non-bias way. The sources are good, but it there needs to be more information available for the home. Through my own research I found there are not many reliable sources on the Thorsen House, so the links included in this article are good sources to have. ￼ The article is concise and overall written well, the images and tables in the article are used well and have strong descriptions. ￼ The Talk page is empty, and the article is rated stub-class mid importance and low importance and is a part of three wikiprojects.Overall, the article is concise but strongly put together. To fully bring the article together I believe more information on the design and architecture of the home is needed- exterior and interior.