User:Kwiatek1212/sandbox

Article Analysis

After reading the first paragraph of the article, I get a sense that it is not written from a neutral perspective. I can tell that whoever wrote the article had a predisposed bias towards Career Transition For Dancers. For the most part, all the information is there in the article, it just isn’t worded or written in a very good way. It seems as if there is missing information regarding what the nonprofit actually does for dancers when their professional careers end. I also noticed that there seem to be citations missing in certain places. For instance, the author does not cite where they received their numerical information from under the Grants and Scholarships section. Some sections were written better than others, for instance the Resources section was one that stood out to me as well organized. The citations check out, for the most part. However, I noticed that one of the citation links did not work properly. The article is a part of WikiProject Chicago, but the article does not have any ratings. Other than that, there are no additional comments in the Talk page.