User:KyanaBee/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Health in Indonesia
 * This article is rated as start-class for quality, but is also rated top-importance.

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * No, this lead has a short introductory sentence that lists four factors affecting health in Indonesia. However, not all of these factors are discussed on the page, nor are they the main topics that the page contains.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * It contains a table of contents, but no written description of the article's major sections.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Yes, but the information is a seemingly random assortment of facts pertaining to health in Indonesia.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * The lead is short (concise) but lacking in information.

Lead evaluation
Needs to be rewritten and expanded upon.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Most of the content is at least a few years old, and some content is out of date.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Most of the content fits into the scope of health in Indonesia, but this article could be expanded upon in multiple areas.

Content evaluation
Needs updating and additional (relevant) content.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * There are not viewpoints that are over or underrepresented, simply topic areas that are underdeveloped.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No

Tone and balance evaluation
Tone and balance is up to standard.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * No, not all facts are cited.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * No, the sources are not all from peer-reviewed literature.
 * Are the sources current?
 * All of the sources are from the 21st century, but some sources are nearly 10 years old.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * The links that I checked do work.

Sources and references evaluation
Needs more citations and more reliable sources, but is not the most pressing aspect of this article to fix.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * It is comprehensible.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * None that I noticed.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Somewhat--the article is broken down into clear sections, but these are not all in a sensible order, nor do they all reflect major points of the topic.

Organization evaluation
The organization of the article could use some improvement.

Images and Media
Guiding questions:


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * No: there are two images, one with data that is not explained.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * One of the images was, but the one with data was not.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * They were not cited.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * Yes, but there were only two images.

Images and media evaluation
Needs great improvement. Could benefit from addition of images.

Checking the talk page
Guiding questions:


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * None
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * Start class, top importance. It is part of WikiProject Indonesia.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * This topic is not discussed on the talk page.

Talk page evaluation
Needs discussion for editors to understand the development of the page.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * This article is very incomplete and is not yet a quality source of information.
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * The article's tone is neutral.
 * How can the article be improved?
 * The lead/content/sources needs the most work the soonest, but all aspects could use improvement.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
 * The article is greatly underdeveloped.

Overall evaluation
The article needs major improvements in all regards.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes ~


 * Link to feedback: Talk page