User:KyleMadden24/Trematoda/CooperOfford Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

KyleMadden24


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:KyleMadden24/Trematoda - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Trematoda - Wikipedia

Lead

 * It does not look like my peer has added to the lead section yet, but I assume they will when they are completely finished. The lead section in the actual article looks pretty good, but could maybe use an extra statement or two summarizing the content of the article.
 * Right now, it looks concise and only has information relevant to the article. I would recommend to my peer that when he is all done with content, add a few sentences to the lead section that summarizes his information.

Content

 * The content added is relative to the topic.
 * The content of the article looks to be up to date with all sources coming from within the last 20ish years.
 * I don't think there is any content that does not belong.

Tone

 * The content that is added looks to be neutral without bias.
 * I don't think anything is under or over represented.

Sources and References

 * The sources used look to be thorough and current
 * I clicked on a few and they matched what content was being added to the article.
 * The sources come from various scientific journals, so I don't think any better ones could be used.
 * The links I checked do work.

Organization

 * The content added is well written and makes sense.
 * I did detect one grammatical error. I think in the second paragraph, it should be 'both light and scanning microscopy were used'
 * I think the content could be organized a bit better by maybe adding some sub heading sections rather than putting it all under physiology.

Images or Media

 * None were used, so not applicable.

Overall impressions

 * I think this was a good article with some interesting content being added by my peer.
 * The quality of the article is improved with the added information of my peer.
 * I think you have a lot of stuff on anatomy and also stuff on physiology, my only advice would be to find more on the physiology of how the things work
 * Also add some summarizing sentences to the lead section that summarizes your content.
 * I thought the 3 phases of host searching was really interesting and a strength of the article.
 * Good job!