User:KylePasco/Victoria Villasana/KylePasco Peer Review

General info
ADEMBONA3, UCLAfan2003, & Isabelaavega
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Victoria Villasana
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead


 * Your lead is very clear and concise, if there is any more that you could use to describe her that could be a possible improvement, but for now it does a good job describing who she is and what she does.

Content


 * Your content is a little light in the Artwork section. You could include some examples of her art, including titles, a description of it, and where it may have been displayed.

Tone and Balance


 * Your tone is very neutral, I don't see anything you could improve with this.

Sources and References


 * You have 6 in text references, but only the first one is a working link and showing up under the reference section. If you fix that I am sure you will be good there.

Organization


 * The organization is very clear and your content follows that organization well.

Overall impressions


 * Overall you guys did a great job, I think with a few small fixes and improvements you will have a very good Wikipedia article. Good luck with this project and finals!

- Kyle