User:KyleSWong/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Ana de Armas

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Given that we selected from Wikiprojects Women, I wanted to choose someone who I had previous knowledge of in order to better assess the article. Blade Runner 2049 has become one of my favorite movies, and in it, Ana de Armas is heavily featured as a futuristic AI technology in the Blade Runner world. I have seen her in other movies as well, so I was curious to read more about her career. I was also surprised that an actress of her caliber would have a B-rated article.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article begins with a concise lead section which describes her largest roles and awards. It spares details about her early life and personal life, however that is not as essential to the reasons for her fame. The lead section includes too many details about the list of movies she has been a part of, and this list somewhat clutters the section. The first paragraph is the most relevant because it both includes her most prominent roles and her biggest awards. There are two grammatical mistakes relating to comma placement the section. Throughout the article, the content is very much relevant and is updated to her most recent role which was portraying Marilyn Monroe in Blonde. It even includes her upcoming roles. The personal life section lacks content, and it consists of a short paragraph about her dating history. The article is fairly neutral because it contains both positive and negative critic reviews of de Armas's acting performances. However, the selections of critical comments are somewhat harsh. Overall, the article is formatted into sections that are easy for the reader to understand, especially since her career is easy to explain in chronological terms. A majority of the facts about her career are cited, particularly ones that involve quotations. Unfortunately, the article seems to lack quotations from de Armas herself. There are also few pictures considering that de Armas has many screen roles. The talk page is rather brief and focuses on a discussion about her ethnicity, particularly about how her ethnicity should be presented in the article. The article is part of several Wikiprojects and has a B rating.