User:Kyle Cameon/Misinformation/Adambocian Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Kyle Cameron


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Misinformation


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Misinformation

Evaluate the drafted changes
I am peer reviewing the original article because I don't think many students like myself have even started their own changes. The topic is up to date and relevant in the article explaining the definition of misinformation and the difference between disinformation. I myself would have added more examples of misinformation to make it easier for the reader to understand it. The content in the article is pretty neutral. I guess if you wanted to stretch it out fake news has been attributed to the Liberal news and they talk about that frequently in the article. The content is up to date and even goes into the history of propaganda and the world wars. The content if well organized in the way that it explains misinformation, goes into the history of it, and then how it affects people in today's society. After looking at Kyle's sources in his sandbox draft they all look up to date and concise. They all look like they are relevant to the topic and good sources of information.