User:Kyle Cameon/Misinformation/NateAugdahl Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kyle Cameon


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Editing User:Kyle Cameon/Misinformation - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Misinformation - Wikipedia
 * Misinformation - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
After reviewing your sandbox draft, I have noticed you did a very nice job on your references you chose. All of the information in the references you chose, seem to be from accurate websites and include accurate information. However, some of the websites credibility may be a little off. My way of fixing this would be to look at all the information in a few of the articles with the same search you used, and see if all the information lines up or at least most of it, considering that some articles may not include the exact same information.

As for your content, I would try and reviewing any content gaps in the original article. I would also edit some of the formatting of this article. A lot of the original article has a lot of words and hardly any indents or bullet points. Someone who is looking for information may not want to have to look super hard for this information. You could make more subtitles or use bullet points to separate the information so that the audience can find the information in a more pleasing and time efficient way. There are hardly any indents in the article, so putting in some indents could go a long way for the audience and their review of this article.