User:Kylefloyd10/Eelpout/LydBo Peer Review

Overall, I think you did a nice job adding new information to the page and I really liked learning about this species!

General info
kylefloyd10
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Eelpout

Evaluate the drafted changes
The Lead for the Eelpout page is concise and clear. It includes the number of species in the family and the oceans that they have been found in. As for the content that you edited, "Metabolic Adaptations to Low Temperatures," I found some small grammar mistakes that could be revised in your Sandbox before submitting it to the final page. Additionally, I see that you referenced a study or investigation in the first sentence, but did not add a citation that links to that study. Then, for the remainder of the section, you reference that study. Was this a one time investigation or studied multiple times? That could influence whether or not you change the wording to omit "it has been investigated" and changed to something like "Eelpouts have adapted to low temperatures via..." In terms of the section "Thermal Stress Responses," you added a lot more information than was previously linked which is amazing! That being said, similar to the first section, I don't see any references referring to the study you mention in this section. I'm also not sure that referencing a study gives a "neutral" point of view, so you'd have to check that! I like that you added an "Evolution" section to this page! However, you say "shallower depths" or "deeper depths" fairly often without referencing an actual depth. Are you sure this is a deep sea organism?

Overall, I think you did a nice job adding new information to the page and I really liked learning about this species!